The New Monasticism: The 12 Marks: Mark #5

Posted in: Spirituality by bill-o on August 21, 2009

“Humble submission to Christ’s body, the church”

To say that we are the body of Christ is to say that we are the ones that are inside of him. It is also to say that we are the visible expression of Christ Jesus on the earth. We, the body of Christ, are the conscious expression of Christ in this world.

The word “church” originally meant “called-out ones”. So, to be in the body of Christ means to be called out of the way of life of the world-systems of the kosmokrator and into the body of the Lord Jesus himself. To be his called-out ones, we are called out of …

Darkness
Lies
Hate

… and into …

Light
Truth
Love

By saying that we are submitting ourselves to the body of Christ, we come into complete agreement with God’s plan for the world. A body submits itself to the direction of its head. Likewise, the body of Christ submits itself to the leading of its head, who is the Christ.

And God’s plan for the world is not for millions of individual but separate and disjointed relationships with him. Rather, his yearning is for a fully unified assembly of followers throughout the whole world. Yet this is something much more than a temporary meeting of people from time to time. Rather, it is a living and organic body of followers. It is a state of being where we are in him and he is in us. This is truly what it means to be bodily present.

Ultimately, this mark implies a radical coming-together of the body of Christ in love. This is where perfect love casts out all fear.

2 Comments »

  1. My, my, what a radical thought! But I wonder about that preposition: is it submission TO Christ’s Body or submission OF Christ’s body to our Head? Both are valid if we consider submission to the Body to be submitting to one another as well as to the Head, but on the other hand there are still many who might look at this as tantamount to submitting to an institutional hierarchy. I agree with the post, I just wouldn’t want some folks to misinterpret it as some sort of man-made thing.

    Comment by Apoblepo — August 25, 2009 @ 1:55 pm

  2. Point well taken, Apoblepo. This mark may need a slight revision in its language.

    Comment by bill-o — August 26, 2009 @ 6:24 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.