- February 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
From Apprentice to Master
Posted in: Popular Culture by bill-o on July 03, 2008
What is the biggest difference between the original three Star Wars films and latest three? Well, … besides the newer special effects, the many Jedi instead of one, and Jar Jar Binks.
What makes Episodes I through III unique is the relationship between master and apprentice. (And, interestingly, that applies to both the Sith and the Jedi Knights.) While largely lost to modern Western culture, this type of relationship has ancient roots: the passing of wisdom, knowledge, and experience from spiritual parents to spiritual children through living and working together over a significant length of time. Many spiritual traditions call this discipleship.
A spiritual father must make himself available to his sons. Likewise, in Star Wars, a master could have only one apprentice. In this way, their attention would be undivided upon one another and upon their common mission.
There are three stages of spiritual development, each of one of which is reflected in the first three episodes of Star Wars:
1. Beginner
2. Apprentice
3. Master
The young beginners in Episode II assist Yoda in finding a missing planet. Here, the relationship between teacher and students is still one to many. Jedi Initiate training is based on remote control devices and is centered in a classroom. Likewise, spiritual beginners concentrate on the basics. The concept of spiritual beginners is seen at monasteries, where new members are known as novices.
Apprentices are known as Padawan learners. The Padawan learner leaves the classroom and learns directly from his master. The master teaches the apprentice through real-life missions. As time progresses, the relationship moves from a father-son dynamic to one more akin to brothers. (A Padawan was physically distinguished from his master by a piece of braided hair.)
Finally, an apprentice becomes fully-qualified to become a master. Spiritual masters are fully trained and competent to perform any action called upon them according to their order. (In Star Wars, it is the Jedi order). Then, in turn, they take apprentices (disciples) for themselves and pass on what they have learned from their masters before them.
3 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This three-part continuum of spiritual growth has been on my mind quite a bit since you turned me on to Kyriacos Markides’s Gifts of the Desert, which I enjoyed reading. I understand from it that the Eastern Orthodox elders divide spiritual mastery into Casarsis, Fotisis, and Theosis. The book was just what I needed to read right now, which I always consider to be a miracle.
By the way, I like your site.
Comment by Peter — July 6, 2008 @ 10:28 am
I love the three-fold approach to spiritual development that I too have just recently been hearing about from the monasteries of Orthodox Christianity. If I recall correctly, one of the elders of the monasteries guides his pupils through the early stages of spiritual growth towards theosis (union with God).
Comment by bill-o — July 6, 2008 @ 4:04 pm
In Star Wars, once an apprentice became qualified as a master, the new master could function independently of his former master. I assume this is also true for monastic Casarsis, Fotisis, and Theosis.
However, from what I understand of spiritual fathers and sons, when a son becomes mature enough to be a father, he still maintains his connection to his spiritual father (just like natural fathers, sons and grandsons). To me this is a very important concept. Masters, themselves, need accountability and a sounding board for ideas and to get inputs from their peers.
Comment by Fred Seigneur — January 20, 2010 @ 2:41 pm